Volume 86
  • Реєстрація



Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

1This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.2This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


The article presents an analysis of participatory urban planning practices in the context of their impact on providing the city with advanced high-quality public spaces. The case of the Heroes of the Heavenly Hundred Square in Zhytomyr shows the positive impact of urban activism on improving the quality of abandoned public space by means of its reconstruction.
The assessment of the quality and the use of the Heroes of the Heavenly Hundred Square after the reconstruction was conducted on the basis of calculations of indices specifying an intensity of use and, in particular, social use, duration of stay of visitors, variety of use and users, and time variety of use. The indices were calculated based on the data collected during the structured observation. The results demonstrate that the square is characterized by a moderate level of intensity of social interaction, high level of intensity, variety and time diversity of use, as well as very high level of user diversity index. Eight areas by the location of different types of square visitors activities have been identified according to the results of observations and surveys; in particular, it is revealed that the areas of chess tables, a cafe, playground and various benches are in the greatest demand in the square. The inclusive accessibility, comfort and safety of the square after its reconstruction are analyzed. It was found that the high social intensity of the Heroes of the Heavenly Hundred Square use show its sacredness for citizens as a place of memory, a place of identity formation, a place that attracts visitors, and a place that encourages Zhytomyr residents to go out to the city.
The study of the impact of urban activism on improving the quality of the abandoned public space (the Heroes of the Heavenly Hundred Square in Zhytomyr) contributes to the discourse on modern transformations of public spaces in the cities of post-socialist countries.

Key words:

city, public spaces, square, integrated development, urban activism, Zhytomyr 





Bernaciak, A., Rzeńca, A., & Sobol, A. (2018). “New” public urban space: citizens’ initiatives in participatory budgeting in Katowice, Łódź and Poznań. Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development22(4), 197-202. Doi: 10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0028.

Gehl, J. (2001). New City Spaces. Copenhagen, The Danish Architectural Press.

Gehl, J. (2007). Public spaces for a changing public life. In C. W. Thompson, & P. Travlou (eds.). Open Space: People Space. Taylor & Francis.

Gryshchenko, М. (2016). Urban public space as an object of sociological study. Herald of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kiev. Sociology1, 31-38. [In Ukrainian]. [Грищенко М. Публічний простір міста як об’єкт соціологічного дослідження //Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Соціологія. 2016. Вип. 1. С. 31-38]

Jacobs, J. (1993). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New-York.

Kalyukin, А., Borén, Т., & Byerley, А. (2015). The second generation of post-socialist change: Gorky Park and public space in Moscow. Urban Geography36(5), 674-695. Doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1020658.

Lopes, M., Cruz, S. S., & Pinho P. (2012). The Changing Publicness of Urban Spaces. In European Symposium on Research in Architecture and Urban Design. Access mode: https://www.researchgate. net/profile/Miguel_Lopes11/publication.

Malchykova, D. (2021). Participatory budgeting practices and civic activism for urban space renovation: the case of Kherson. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya / Економічна та соціальна географія85, 38-48. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2021.85.38-48.

Mezentsev, K., & Mezentseva, N. (2017). Modern transformations of Kyiv public spaces: prerequisites, manifestations and specifics. Human Geography Journal22, 39-46. Doi: 10.26565/2076-1333-2017-22-07 [In Ukrainian]. [Мезенцев К., Мезенцева Н. Сучасні трансформації публічних просторів Києва: передумови, прояв та специфіка // Часопис соціально-економічної географії. 2017. Вип. 22. С. 39-46. Doi: 10.26565/2076-1333-2017-22-07].

Mezentsev, K., Neugebauer, C., & Mezentseva, N. (2017). Civil Society. In I. Brade, C. S. Neugebauer (eds.). Urban Eurasia. Cities in Transformation (рр. 275-282). Berlin: DOM publishers.

Mezentsev, K., Provotar, N., & Palchuk, M. (2020). Public spaces through the lens of participatory urban planning – the case of Kyiv. Ukrainian Geographical Journal2(110), 30-37. Doi: 10.15407/ugz2020.02.030 [In Ukrainian]. [Мезенцев К. В, Провотар Н. І., Пальчук М. В. Публічні простори через призму партисипативного міського планування – приклад Києва // Український географічний журнал. 2020. Вип. 2 (110). С. 30-37. Doi: 10.15407/ugz2020.02.030].

Mezentseva, N., & Palchuk, M. (2016). Urban public spaces: understanding through the prism of foreign discourse. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya76, 19-26. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2016.76.19-26 [In Ukrainian]. [Мезенцева Н., Пальчук М. Публічні простори міст: осмислення через призму зарубіжного дискурсу // Економічна та соціальна географія. 2016. Вип. 76. С. 19-26. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2016.76.19-26].

Mezentseva, N., & Palchuk, M. (2018). Open public spaces of Kyiv in the context of socio-spacial approach. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya80, 18-27. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2018.80.18-27 [In Ukrainian]. [Мезенцева, Н. І., Пальчук, М. В. Відкриті публічні простори Києва в контексті соціально-просторового підходу // Економічна та соціальна географія. 2018. Вип. 80. С. 18-27. Doi: 10.17721/2413-7154/2018.80.18-27].

Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy. Local Government Studies36(4), 477-491.

Neal, Z. (2010). Seeking common ground: three perspectives on public space. Urban Design and Planning163(2), 59-66.

Neal, Z., & Orum, A. (eds.). Common ground? Readings and Reflections on Public Space. (2009). New York: Routledge.

The concept of Untegrated development of Zhytomyr until 2030 (2019). [In Ukrainian]. [Концепція інтегрованого розвитку Житомира до 2030 року. 2019. 258 с.].

Whyte, H. W. (2000). How to Turn a Place Around. A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces. Projects for Public Space Inc.

Worpole, K., & Knox, С. (2007). The Social Value of Public Spaces. New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.


Suggested citation: Bulycheva, T., Butkaliuk, K., Gryniuk, T. (2021). Provotar, N., Ohiichuk, N. (2021). Public spaces of Zhytomyr: a places that encourages residents to go out to the city. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya / Економічна та соціальна географія86, 40–52, https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2021.86.40-52

Print ISSN: 2413-7154. Online ISSN: 2413-7553

Author Guidelines

Instruction for authors: 

Reviewer Guidelines

Download Reviewer's Form: 

Publication Ethics

Current Issue

Contact information

Editorial address:

Department of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Prospekt Akademika Hlushkova, 2a, MSP-680, Kyiv, Ukraine 

Tel .: 00 38 044 521-32-24,

00 38 044 521-35-79

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Contact us